ArticleJHLT open2026
Long COVID sequelae in heart transplant recipients.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Post acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (also known as Long COVID) have been defined as symptoms that persist after 3 months from initial acute episode of COVID-19. While the pathophysiology and mechanisms that cause Long COVID are hypothesized as secondary to persistent inflammation and immune dysregulation, the burden of this disease remains difficult to estimate due to varied symptomatology. Solid-organ transplant recipients in particular remain a vulnerable population that has been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impact of Long COVID among orthotopic heart transplant recipients (OHTRs)-a patient population on chronic immunosuppressive therapy-remains incompletely characterized. We sought to evaluate patient-reported Long COVID symptoms between OHTRs compared to patients with baseline cardiomyopathy. We conducted a prospective survey-based study of adult OHTRs and cardiomyopathy control patients with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants completed telephone surveys, which included questionnaires of symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and mental health assessment. Between-group differences were evaluated using multivariable models adjusting for baseline characteristics. Our results show that the prevalence of Long COVID symptoms did not significantly differ between OHTRs and patients with cardiomyopathy. Dyspnea was reported more frequently in the non-OHTR group; however, this association was attenuated after adjusting for a higher burden of underlying pulmonary disease. No evidence of increased overall symptom burden was observed among OHTRs. In this first comparative analysis of Long COVID among OHTRs and control cardiomyopathy patients, OHTRs demonstrated no increase in symptom burden and may experience fewer persistent symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.