ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
Computational modelling for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning: a systematic review of complications and decision support.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-specific digital simulation is emerging as a tool to support personalized planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), particularly as the procedure expands to younger, lower-risk patients, and more complex anatomies. Despite procedural advances, complications such as paravalvular leak, conduction disturbances, coronary obstruction, and aortic injury remain important determinants of outcome. Current pre-procedural planning relies heavily on computed tomography-based anatomical assessment, which is indispensable but largely static and cannot fully capture dynamic device-tissue interactions, and haemodynamic mechanisms underlying many procedural events. Computational modelling derived from patient-specific imaging can extend this assessment by simulating valve deployment, device-tissue contact, and flow, offering mechanistic insight and potential support for individualized procedural decision-making. This systematic review evaluates modelling approaches addressing TAVR complications and procedural planning, including high-risk scenarios such as bicuspid valves and valve-in-valve procedures. Across the literature, modelling enables patient-specific simulations and exploration of procedural strategies that may reduce complication risk. However, clinical translation remains limited by small study populations, heterogeneous methodologies, limited patient-specific validation, and lack of integration into routine workflows. Future progress will require validation against clinically meaningful endpoints, scalable digital infrastructure, and close collaboration between clinicians and engineers to incorporate simulation outputs into routine Heart Team decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.