ReviewFrontiers in systems biology2026
Multilayer network approaches to omics data integration in digital twins for cancer research.
Review in Frontiers in systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biochemically Constrained Multi-Omics Integration Reveals Protein-Metabolite Dependencies Across Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How can we effectively integrate and represent heterogeneous multi-omics data to better understand complex biological systems and support the development of personalized digital models? The growing availability of high-dimensional omics data across different molecular scales presents both opportunities and challenges in biomedical research. Traditional approaches often treat each omics layer in isolation or rely on concatenation strategies that obscure the interactions between different regulatory layers. In this review, we discuss the multilayer network-based framework as an extensive representation of different omics data types, capturing the modularity, redundancy and cross-talk between layers, and providing a more faithful interpretable view of the biological system. We explore how this approach can be used as a basis for the construction of Digital Twins, computational replicas of individual biological systems capable of simulating disease progression and treatment outcomes. In contrast to existing multi-omics integration reviews), we emphasize the role of multilayer networks as a mechanistic and interpretable scaffold for Digital Twins development. We discuss key methodological considerations, benefits and potential applications of this approach, highlighting its promise for advancing both our understanding of biological complexity and our ability to design personalized interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.