ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2026
To Evaluate Clinical Performance of Preformed Zirconia Crowns, Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing Zirconia Crowns, and Bioflx Crowns in Primary Molars Postendodontic Therapy.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of preformed zirconia crowns, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) zirconia crowns, and preformed resin polymer crowns in primary molars following endodontic therapy. Materials and methods: This comparative study was conducted on 36 primary molars requiring full coronal coverage after pulp therapy. The teeth were randomly assigned into three groups ( Results: Group A consistently showed superior color stability and parental satisfaction over time, with all crowns maintaining color match at 12 months. Group B also performed well but showed slight translucency changes in some cases. Group C demonstrated the incidence of color changes and lower parental satisfaction. Statistically significant differences in color stability were observed at 9 and 12 months ( Conclusion: CAD/CAM zirconia crowns exhibited the best overall clinical performance, especially in terms of color stability and aesthetics, followed closely by preformed zirconia crowns. Bioflx crowns were clinically acceptable but comparatively inferior in long-term aesthetic outcomes. How to cite this article: Solanki R, Gupta N, Ghambir N,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.