Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42328198›Full record

ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2026

Bridging annotated microscopy imaging data and analysis method development for scientific discovery.

Kevin A Yamauchi, Virginie Uhlmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin A YamauchiDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, CH, Switzerland.
Virginie UhlmannDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences, Universität Zürich, Zürich, CH, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While modern imaging technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to observe life across scales, distilling an understanding of the underlying biological processes from these complex, high-dimensional data remains challenging. Computational analysis methods have been lagging behind our ability to produce data, as their development often requires expertise across multiple domains, including life and computer sciences. Annotated image datasets play a key role in fostering the development and improvement of microscopy image analysis methods, as they offer a realistic basis to build upon and invaluable ground truth to evaluate and optimize performance. Drawing inspiration from adjacent fields to microscopy imaging, we discuss in this perspective how sharing annotated datasets has driven progress in computational analysis. We emphasize the critical role that open data standards and infrastructure play in realizing the full scientific potential of annotated image datasets and close by highlighting opportunities for members across the scientific community to cultivate a dynamic ecosystem of data, infrastructure, and analysis methods to elevate research quality and accelerate innovation.

Identifiers

PMID42328198
PMCPMC13280720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.