ReviewPulmonary circulation2026
HIV-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Resource-Limited Settings: A "Forgotten" Diagnosis, a Great Imitator, and a Multi-Hit Pulmonary Vasculopathy.
Review in Pulmonary circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HIV-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (HIV-PAH) remains one of the most consequential cardiopulmonary complications in people living with HIV (PLWH), persisting despite expanded antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage. Although contemporary hemodynamic criteria define pulmonary hypertension (PH) as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as pre-capillary physiology confirmed by right heart catheterization (mPAP > 20 mmHg, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤ 15 mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance > 2 Wood units), global epidemiologic certainty remains uneven. In high-income settings, prospective screening paradigms incorporating catheter confirmation estimate HIV-PAH prevalence at approximately 0.5%, exemplified by the multicenter French study reporting 0.46%. In contrast, in sub-Saharan Africa-home to more than 26 million PLWH-the population prevalence of catheter-confirmed HIV-PAH remains undefined, with echocardiography-based studies in symptomatic cohorts reporting substantially higher rates of elevated pulmonary pressures. Mechanistically, HIV-PAH is best conceptualized as a multi-hit pulmonary vasculopathy driven by viral proteins (Tat, Nef, gp120), chronic immune activation, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, dysregulated endothelin signaling, and growth-factor pathways, with amplification by endemic co-factors and host susceptibility. Clinically, HIV-PAH is a "clinically nonspecific phenotype", frequently obscured by tuberculosis-related lung disease, anemia, left heart disease, and other causes of dyspnea in resource-limited settings. Early recognition is critical because prognosis depends on preservation of right ventricular function. A practical, resource-appropriate strategy is required: heightened clinical suspicion, echocardiography-anchored detection, systematic exclusion of alternative PH etiologies, rational biomarker use, and referral pathways to right heart catheterization where feasible. ART optimization is necessary but insufficient; PAH-targeted therapies can improve functional and hemodynamic outcomes, though HIV-specific randomized evidence remains limited. Implementation science and mechanism-informed research in endemic regions are urgently needed to close the diagnostic and therapeutic gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.