ArticleJournal of industrial ecology2025
Assessing mining-related land footprints of global steel use with a global physical input-output model.
Article in Journal of industrial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production of iron and steel poses numerous sustainability challenges, including the often-overlooked environmental impact of iron ore mining through its land use. Although the global area affected is small, iron ore mining involves intensive land exploitation, with sites typically located far from steel users, creating a disconnect between impacts and beneficiaries. This study overcomes this disconnect by applying a consumption-based footprint perspective to quantify land-related pressures and impacts of mining, providing quantitative evidence for debates about responsibility and impact mitigation. A multi-regional physical input-output model of global iron-steel supply chains is extended with geospatial data on biomes, mining-related land use, and associated impacts (human appropriation of net primary production). The results show that the majority of mining-related land impacts are attributable to steel use in China and Europe (48% and 16%, respectively). Per-capita indicators reveal that China ranks fourth in terms of steel use, but first in embodied land impacts, which is due to its high indirect iron ore requirement per unit of steel use (3.28 t/t). If China were to match Japan's indirect iron ore requirement (1.70 t/t), its mining-land impacts could decrease by 59%. Notably, 71% of China's embodied land impacts occur domestically, offering greater control over impact mitigation than other regions. Europe, the region with the largest share of tropical biomes in its embodied iron ore imports (39.5%), bears significant responsibility for mining-related impacts in these ecologically vulnerable regions. We highlight policy implications, especially for China and Europe, and conclude with a discussion of the modeling approach. This article met the requirements for a gold-gold Supplementary Information: The online version of this article (doi:10.1111/jiec.70107) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.