ArticleJournal of industrial ecology2025
Bridging the SME reporting gap: A new model for predicting Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
Article in Journal of industrial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a novel statistical model for predicting Scope 1 and 2 emissions for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Trained on financial transaction data from over 100,000 UK SMEs, the model targets a business segment excluded from formal emissions reporting and often under-engaged in sustainability efforts. By leveraging scalable, objective data, our approach offers an accessible alternative to existing methods that rely on either coarse sectoral averages or detailed, resource-intensive firm-level activity data. In developing the model, we evaluate a range of predictors and find that incorporating industry-level variables beyond basic emission intensity significantly enhances predictive accuracy. We also observe diminishing returns from additional model complexity, reinforcing the value of a parsimonious, low-input design. The final model achieves RSQ values of 0.89 for Scope 1 and 0.72 for Scope 2, improves accuracy by up to 50% compared to sector-level estimates, and performs reliably on out-of-sample data. Our findings provide a simpler approach to emissions estimation for SMEs, supporting broader climate engagement among smaller actors. Supplementary Information: The online version of this article (doi:10.1111/jiec.70106) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.