Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42328106›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial ecology2025

Institutionalization of circular business models in the United States.

Nancy Bocken, Matthew Coffay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nancy BockenMaastricht Sustainability Institute, School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-4074
Matthew CoffayCentre for Sustainable Business, NHH Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5156-447X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition to a circular economy challenges existing regulatory frameworks, social norms, and belief systems: the dominant institutions. Moving from a linear to circular business model (CBM) is essential for sustainable business transformation. While CBMs have been widely studied in Europe, less is known about their emergence in the United States, where a national circular economy policy is still absent. This study explores how CBMs emerge in the United States, analyzing semi-structured interviews with companies and employing deductive thematic analysis alongside institutional work theory. First, we identify a variety of successful CBMs in the United States. Second, we present a framework of pathways for circular business innovation. Third, we present a "Circular Business Institutionalization Framework," which bridges theories on institutional work and ecologies of business models. The frameworks offer insights into institutional leverage points and strategic positioning, with implications for guiding future sustainability transitions. Supplementary Information: The online version of this article (doi:10.1111/jiec.70115) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Indexed as

business modelscircular economyinstitutional theoryinstitutional workNorth AmericaUSA

Identifiers

PMID42328106
PMCPMC13279581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.