ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
A desirability index framework for the bioprospecting of carrots grown in the Andean region for fresh, feed, cosmetic and nutraceutical applications.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Carrot agrobiodiversity encompasses a broad range of compositional, sensory, technological, and biofunctional attributes. However, its industrial valorization remains constrained by the lack of quantitative decision criteria capable of translating sector-specific quality priorities into operational specifications for raw-material selection. This study proposes an application-driven bioprospecting framework for Andean carrot materials by integrating multidimensional quality data into phenotypically coherent typologies and industry-tailored desirability indices. Methods: Fourteen carrot materials grown under uniform Andean agronomic conditions were characterized using physicochemical, nutritional, colorimetric, safety-related, and biofunctional variables. Multivariate clustering, including PCA, K-means, and hierarchical clustering, was combined with univariate inference to identify statistically supported phenotypic contrasts. A mathematical framework implementing four sector-specific desirability indices-fresh consumption, functional foods, wet pet feed, and natural cosmetics-was developed using weighted utility functions, min-max normalization, and Gaussian penalty terms. Results: The analysis resolved four contrasting phenotypic groups: an extreme purple phenotype with elevated phenolic content and antioxidant capacity; a pale group with reduced carotenoid levels; and two differentiated orange groups showing variation in pigment density, soluble solids, dry matter content, and morphometric uniformity. The industry-specific indices produced differentiated rankings across value chains, identifying 6KUR and 5BER as promising materials for fresh consumption, 13FLA for functional foods and natural cosmetics, and 9NAN, 13FLA, and 8NAN for wet pet feed. These results also revealed structural trade-offs, as no single genotype simultaneously maximized performance across all evaluated sectors. Discussion: Overall, the proposed cluster-index-valorization workflow provides a reproducible quantitative framework linking agrobiodiversity characterization with industry-oriented raw-material selection. The approach supports early-stage portfolio design, sourcing decisions, and bioprospecting strategies for agro-industrial value chains prior to product-scale validation, while offering a transferable decision-support logic for plant matrices with relevant intra-specific variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.