Identifying systemic risks and mitigation strategies of artificial intelligence in agriculture: from social-technical-ecological systems framework.

While the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in global agriculture is widely acknowledged, especially its contributions to plant protection and agricultural production, much of the research mainly highlights its benefits, overlooking the potential impacts of AI on agricultural systems, including planting, cropping, irrigation, and fertilization. While certain studies have started to explore specific challenges, a comprehensive and integrated analysis of these risks across agricultural systems remains largely unaddressed. This study employs a narrative review and in-depth reflection, adopts the Social-Technical-Ecological Systems (STES) framework to analyze these risks, with plant protection and development as the illustrative examples. The social subsystem faces potential risks, including unemployment, social inequality, and systemic exclusion. Within the technical subsystem, we identify risks such as uncertainties in technical devices, inaccuracies in AI model decisions, untraceable AI black-box decision-making, and network security vulnerabilities. Within the ecological subsystem, AI may lead to biodiversity loss, climate uncertainties, and potential environmental pollution. To mitigate these risks, we propose targeted strategies. In the social subsystem, recommendations include enhancing farmers' livelihood resilience, improving the inclusivity and accessibility of AI, and integrating principles of social equity. In the technical subsystem, this involves optimizing AI agricultural devices, enhancing the accuracy of AI decision-making, improving the transparency of AI models, and ensuring network security. For the ecological subsystem, strategies focus on embedding biodiversity goals, developing climate-friendly AI agriculture, and integrating ecological monitoring and evaluation. At the overall system level, if the balance among subsystems is not sufficiently considered, it may lead to cross-system risks. Collaborative risk governance is crucial for balancing social equity, technical efficiency, and ecological sustainability. This study provides actionable guidance for policymakers, AI developers, and farmers to achieve efficient, equitable, and sustainable AI-driven agriculture, offering important reference value for advancing intelligent phytoprotection and smart agricultural development.