ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Application of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in the investigation of novel ovine skin lesions in Norway.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Contagious ovine digital dermatitis (CODD) is a globally emerging polymicrobial foot disease in sheep that causes severe welfare and economic problems. Currently, there is no validated commercial laboratory diagnostic test for CODD, and the current 'gold standard' is the pathological scoring of foot lesions. In this study, we used a combination of gross pathological lesion scoring and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of the bacterial microbiome to investigate novel suspected CODD foot lesions identified in three Norwegian abattoirs. Methods: We conducted 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of biopsy samples from novel Norwegian foot lesions ( Results: Gross pathology and bacterial microbiome compositional analysis revealed that the novel CODD-like lesions were pathologically and bacteriologically distinct from healthy skin, CODD lesions, and footrot lesions. The novel CODD-like lesions presented as ulceration in the skin region immediately dorsal to the coronary band, extending distally below the carpus/tarsus, and were associated with hair loss, haemorrhage, and crusting. A comparison of the bacterial microbiota in the novel CODD-like lesions with those found in healthy skin, CODD lesions, and footrot lesions revealed that the bacterial communities were significantly different in terms of diversity, phylogeny, and microbial composition. Conclusion: Gross pathological lesion description, used in combination with 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the bacterial microbiome, demonstrated that the novel Norwegian skin lesions involved a dysbiosis that differed substantially from what has been previously described for CODD lesions and that the lesions were highly unlikely to be CODD. Further studies on the aetiopathogenesis of this novel sheep hoof condition should enable improved diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.