Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42328067›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Application of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in the investigation of novel ovine skin lesions in Norway.

J S Duncan, J W Angell, L Lenzi, X Liu, G J Staton, N J Evans, M Gilhuus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J S DuncanDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Wirral, United Kingdom.
J W AngellDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Wirral, United Kingdom.
L LenziCentre for Genomic Research, Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
X LiuCentre for Genomic Research, Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
G J StatonDepartment of Infection Biology & Microbiomes, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, The University of Liverpool, Wirral, United Kingdom.
N J EvansDepartment of Infection Biology & Microbiomes, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, The University of Liverpool, Wirral, United Kingdom.
M GilhuusAnimalia - Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Contagious ovine digital dermatitis (CODD) is a globally emerging polymicrobial foot disease in sheep that causes severe welfare and economic problems. Currently, there is no validated commercial laboratory diagnostic test for CODD, and the current 'gold standard' is the pathological scoring of foot lesions. In this study, we used a combination of gross pathological lesion scoring and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of the bacterial microbiome to investigate novel suspected CODD foot lesions identified in three Norwegian abattoirs. Methods: We conducted 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of biopsy samples from novel Norwegian foot lesions ( Results: Gross pathology and bacterial microbiome compositional analysis revealed that the novel CODD-like lesions were pathologically and bacteriologically distinct from healthy skin, CODD lesions, and footrot lesions. The novel CODD-like lesions presented as ulceration in the skin region immediately dorsal to the coronary band, extending distally below the carpus/tarsus, and were associated with hair loss, haemorrhage, and crusting. A comparison of the bacterial microbiota in the novel CODD-like lesions with those found in healthy skin, CODD lesions, and footrot lesions revealed that the bacterial communities were significantly different in terms of diversity, phylogeny, and microbial composition. Conclusion: Gross pathological lesion description, used in combination with 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the bacterial microbiome, demonstrated that the novel Norwegian skin lesions involved a dysbiosis that differed substantially from what has been previously described for CODD lesions and that the lesions were highly unlikely to be CODD. Further studies on the aetiopathogenesis of this novel sheep hoof condition should enable improved diagnosis.

Indexed as

CODDfootrotlamenesslesionsmicrobiomesheepskin

Identifiers

PMID42328067
PMCPMC13276613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.