ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Regulation of the veterinary profession: the authorization to practice, origins, milestones, and emerging challenges.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Veterinary medicine has evolved over centuries into a profession concerned not only with animal health, but also with public health, food safety, and the wellbeing of ecosystems. Its impact therefore extends beyond individual animals and their owners to society as a whole. To safeguard quality and prevent substandard care, the veterinary profession is subject to regulation. Only suitably qualified individuals are permitted to practice, with authorization systems administered either directly by governments or through professional regulatory bodies. This paper examines the development of regulation as a mechanism for maintaining and enforcing quality in veterinary services across European countries. It explores how "quality" in veterinary medicine is conceptualized and defined, and how regulatory frameworks are implemented in practice. It also highlights significant transformations in the field over recent decades. In light of these developments, the paper evaluates the extent to which regulatory bodies remain capable of fulfilling their mandates and sustaining public trust in the profession. Other regulated domains are considered only where they fall within the authority of the regulatory body-for example, when rules on animal welfare or food safety are incorporated into the profession's Code of Conduct." The paper argues that, although regulatory frameworks are designed to ensure quality, they are increasingly challenged by new developments such as changing market dynamics, corporatization, and technological change. These pressures raise important questions about their continuing effectiveness. The authors conclude that further research is needed, particularly to assess the implementation and effectiveness of professional regulation, which may lead to recommendations that could improve both the quality of veterinary services and the standing of the profession itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.