ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
Data-centric review of multimodal emotion recognition: datasets, feature extraction, data fusion and limitations.
Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion recognition is a major challenge in affective computing. It enables systems to determine human emotions using multiple modalities, such as text, audio, facial expressions, and physiological data. The field of multimodal emotion recognition (MER) has achieved significant advances in recent years. Present studies tend to focus on single structures and fusion methods only. It provides little interaction between the modalities, input features, and learning models. An overview of MER studies that can be both modality-based and data-driven is provided in the present investigation. We present a methodical assesment of uni-, bi-, and multimodal frameworks, incorporating models to express emotions, feature extraction processes, fusion methods, learning methods, and benchmark datasets. We also provide an individual review approach that integrates performance with textual, acoustic, optical, and physical dimensions. Furthermore, it includes a thorough review for data-centric issues and mitigating approaches. We also consider benchmark multimodal datasets to tackle major problems such as modal diversity, annotating cost, data unavailability, and class imbalance. The MER workflow incorporates novel concepts, including linguistic models based on self-supervised learning. This review identifies opportunities for more robust and sustainable MER frameworks and highlights the remaining research challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.