ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026
Is rectal preparation necessary in contemporary image-guided prostate radiotherapy?
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Is rectal preparation necessary in contemporary image-guided prostate radiotherapy?"Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rectal preparation during prostate radiotherapy (RT) was established in the era of two-dimensional bone-based IGRT, but its necessity with contemporary three-dimensional IGRT is uncertain. We examined the impact of omitting rectal preparation on prostate inter- and intrafraction motion, rectal volume, and their relationship. Methods: Two datasets were analysed. Dataset one included patients receiving RT for de novo prostate cancer on a C-arm linear accelerator, stratified by use of micro-enema or no rectal preparation. Interfraction prostate motion was calculated from daily CBCT, and compared between preparation groups, with further stratification by rectal volume on planning CT (pCT) < 90 or ≥ 90 cm Results: Dataset one included 255 patients: 96 with and 159 without rectal preparation. Median rectal volume on pCT (proportion with rectal volume ≥ 90 cm Conclusion: Rectal preparation reduced the proportion of patients with a large rectum on pCT by only 10-15 %. A large rectum modestly increased interfraction motion but did not affect intrafraction motion. Findings suggest rectal preparation is not universally required with contemporary IGRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.