ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Is urinary toxicology rapid screening a useful first-line diagnostic tool for paediatric coma in the emergency department?
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Coma in paediatric patients is a medical emergency requiring prompt identification of the underlying cause to prevent serious complications. Among the most frequent and often underrecognized causes in young children are accidental ingestions of cannabinoids and opioids, which may go unreported by caregivers either because unwitnessed or for lack of awareness of the potential risks. In this context, rapid urine screening (RUS) is a highly valuable diagnostic tool: it is inexpensive, quick, easy to perform, and sensitive to many common neurotoxic substances. In this study, we systematically reviewed the available literature on Medline regarding paediatric patients with intoxication-induced coma presenting to the emergency department. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed in PubMed. Results: 32 case reports encompassing 57 paediatric cases were identified. Urine screening enabled identification of the toxic agent in approximately two-thirds of patients (20 RUS), helping guide early therapeutic decisions. Although qualitative and not always reflective of the severity of intoxication, RUS remains effective in the initial clinical assessment. However, RUS is not considered as a potentially useful early investigation, to be performed after glucose level and blood tests, before other procedures such as CT scan, lumbar puncture or EEG, in most paediatric guidelines. Discussion: The available epidemiological evidence of the last few years suggests that routine implementation of RUS in children under 4 years of age presenting with altered consciousness may reduce the need for invasive procedures such as lumbar puncture or computed tomography scan and support timely, targeted management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.