ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
First experience of hemadsorption with HA60 cartridges in newborns and small infants with septic shock: a case series.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blood purification techniques are rarely used in low-weight pediatric patients because extracorporeal circuits and devices designed for adults may expose neonates and infants to significant adverse events. Recently, hemoadsorption cartridges with low priming volumes (Jafron®) have become available. Case description: We report a descriptive case series of four pediatric patients treated with hemoadsorption using HA60 cartridges, including two neonates (2.8 kg and 3.5 kg) and two infants (7 kg and 10 kg). All patients were admitted to the PICU with septic shock and received standard therapy, including broad-spectrum antibiotics and vasoactive agents. Two of the four patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) because of severe respiratory and circulatory failure. In all patients, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was initiated for acute kidney injury and/or fluid overload, and HA60 hemoadsorption was added. Clinical and laboratory parameters, together with vasoactive drug requirements, were recorded from the initiation of hemoadsorption until the end of treatment. Three of the four patients survived. Discussion and conclusions: Our findings are limited to describing the feasibility and safety of HA60 hemoadsorption in neonates and small infants with septic shock, as well as the logistical aspects associated with the use of these novel extracorporeal technologies, rather than demonstrating clinical efficacy. No major adverse events were observed. Within this perspective, the fatal outcome observed in Case 1 was considered unrelated to the hemoadsorption procedure itself. Given the descriptive nature of the study and the presence of multiple concomitant therapies, no conclusions regarding efficacy can be drawn. Larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.