Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327888›Full record

ArticleActa medica Philippina2026

Research Needs in Philippine Pharmaceutical Sciences: A Qualitative Perspective from Regulatory and Clinical Research Sectors of the Pharmaceutical Industry.

Imelda G Peña, Honeymae C Alos, Nicole Kaye R Calara, Hilary Grace C Pavia, Bryan Paul I Bulatao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Imelda G PeñaInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila.
Honeymae C AlosInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila.
Nicole Kaye R CalaraInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila.
Hilary Grace C PaviaInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila.
Bryan Paul I BulataoInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify problems and highlight opportunities for pharmaceutical sciences research in the Philippine pharmaceutical industry's regulatory and clinical research sectors that might have been previously overlooked or underrepresented. It identified current issues that can be addressed by research covering four areas of pharmaceutical sciences: drug design and discovery, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, formulation design and pharmaceutical technology, and regulatory science. Methods: A descriptive qualitative approach was used in this study. Data collection was facilitated by key informant interviews (KII) using a standardized interview guide with open-ended questions to identify the pharmaceutical science research needs of the specific sectors. A purposive sampling method was employed, with five key informants (KIs), including the company vice president, director, and top-level managers from different local and multinational pharmaceutical companies. ATLAS.ti software was utilized to facilitate thematic synthesis for qualitative data analysis. Results: Thirteen common themes were identified from the KIs, such as (1) incomplete development of therapeutic compounds, (2) sustainability of raw materials supply, (3) regulation of herbal medicines versus food supplements, (4) mapping disease priorities through the Philippine pharmaceutical roadmap, (5) government incentives and policies to support research, (6) technical personnel, (7) suboptimal regulatory process, approvals, and implementation, (8) gap in utilization of acquired knowledge on regulations, (9) regulatory governance, (10) passive regulatory action on counterfeit drugs, (11) PIC/S GMP version 14 adaption, (12) formulation optimization, and (13) active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) sourcing and regulation. Based on insights from the International Pharmaceutical Federation regarding anticipated hurdles in pharmaceutical sciences over the next 5-10 years, priority research needs were identified through KIs' input. Relevant action plans were developed, including the creation of research proposals to isolate, purify, and determine chemical structures of natural products, as well as analyzing recent Philippine Health Statistics to help assess the appropriateness of new drug releases for patient needs. Other action plans include forecasting future disease burdens in the country, performing toxicology studies (Health-Based Evaluation Levels/No Observed Adverse Effect Level or HBEL/NOAEL) for common generic drugs, and ensuring that research efforts are directed toward addressing the Philippine pharmaceutical regulatory and clinical research sector's most pressing needs practically and feasibly. Conclusion: This study offers valuable insights into pharmaceutical sciences research and development initiatives within the regulatory and clinical research sectors in the Philippine pharmaceutical industry. These findings have the potential to catalyze transformative advancements in healthcare delivery and outcomes, positioning the Philippines for global excellence and competitiveness.

Indexed as

drug approvalhealth policypharmaceutical sciencesqualitative researchthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID42327888
PMCPMC13281454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.