Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327884›Full record

ArticleActa medica Philippina2026

Analysis of Forensic and Drowning Death Studies Using VOSviewer: A Bibliometric Study.

Iwan Aflanie, Adelia Umi Habibah, Naila Amirah Rahmadina, Pandji Winata Nurikhwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iwan AflanieLambung Mangkurat University, South Kalimantan, Indonesia.
Adelia Umi HabibahLambung Mangkurat University, South Kalimantan, Indonesia.
Naila Amirah RahmadinaLambung Mangkurat University, South Kalimantan, Indonesia.
Pandji Winata NurikhwanLambung Mangkurat University, South Kalimantan, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drowning is a significant cause of accidental death worldwide, and forensic investigation plays an important role in determining the circumstances and causes of these deaths. Despite its importance, research in forensic investigations related to drowning remains fragmented and insufficiently characterized. Objective: This study aimed to examine trends and patterns in publications on forensic examinations related to drowning deaths. Specifically, it sought to identify research gaps, highlight key contributions, and determine major thematic areas in the field. Methods: A total of 116 articles published between 2014 and 2023 were retrieved from the PubMed database using search terms related to forensic science and drowning deaths. Bibliometric analysis was performed using VOSviewer (version 1.6.20) to identify research clusters, patterns of author collaboration, and keyword co-occurrence. Filtered data were exported in .txt format to facilitate analysis and visualization. Results: Visualization analysis identified seven thematic clusters. China had the highest number of publications on this topic. The Academy of Forensic Science in Shanghai was the most productive institution, while Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi had the highest number of publications. Lippmann J. was the most prolific author. The most frequently cited source received 180 citations. The three most commonly discussed topics were drowning, forensic pathology, and autopsy, while the most frequent terms overall were forensic pathology, autopsy, and people. Conclusion: The findings indicate substantial initial research interest in forensic investigations of drowning. However, publication output during the study period showed a downward trend, with a decrease of 16.4%. This decline suggests a notable gap in the literature and highlights the need for further research in this field.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisdrowning deathforensic scienceVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID42327884
PMCPMC13281450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.