ArticleDiscover public health2026
Multidisciplinarity is vital to pandemic management and preparedness.
Article in Discover public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Governments around the world sought to address the Covid-19 pandemic through a range of engagements with various kinds of experts. At the same time, some disciplinary perspectives were privileged over others. For instance, while calls were made during the pandemic for more social science expertise on advisory panels, formal mechanisms for integrating insights from these disciplines were often more limited than would have been ideal. Some governments are now undertaking inquiries to assess national responses to Covid-19, including in relation to how knowledge and evidence was leveraged during the pandemic. In the UK, the official Covid-19 inquiry is ongoing, yet reports for the first two 'Modules' have been published and bear scrutiny for relevant insights. Module 2 remarks on the importance of different perspectives in tackling the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the wider effects of infection on society. Moving forward, to prepare for future pandemics full engagement across a wider range of disciplines - including across the humanities and social sciences - is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.