Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327872›Full record

ArticleDiscover public health2026

Multidisciplinarity is vital to pandemic management and preparedness.

Martyn Pickersgill

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Discover public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martyn PickersgillSchool of Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Governments around the world sought to address the Covid-19 pandemic through a range of engagements with various kinds of experts. At the same time, some disciplinary perspectives were privileged over others. For instance, while calls were made during the pandemic for more social science expertise on advisory panels, formal mechanisms for integrating insights from these disciplines were often more limited than would have been ideal. Some governments are now undertaking inquiries to assess national responses to Covid-19, including in relation to how knowledge and evidence was leveraged during the pandemic. In the UK, the official Covid-19 inquiry is ongoing, yet reports for the first two 'Modules' have been published and bear scrutiny for relevant insights. Module 2 remarks on the importance of different perspectives in tackling the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the wider effects of infection on society. Moving forward, to prepare for future pandemics full engagement across a wider range of disciplines - including across the humanities and social sciences - is essential.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health policyHumanities and social sciencesMultidisciplinarityPandemic preparednessScience advice

Identifiers

PMID42327872
PMCPMC13279656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.