ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Effects of physical therapy modalities for early postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate and compare the effects of various physical therapy modalities in mitigating early postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: This systematic review and NMA was conducted according to PRISMA-NMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, SPORTDiscus, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of eight physical therapy modalities on early postoperative pain in patients with TKA. Data were synthesized using a frequentist framework, and the outcome was pain reduction, assessed using validated pain scales such as the Visual Analogue Scale. Results: A total of 42 RCTs involving 3,165 participants were included. The NMA demonstrated that electroacupuncture, manual lymphatic drainage (MLD), kinesio taping and cryotherapy all significantly alleviated early postoperative pain following TKA compared to controls. Effect sizes [standardized mean differences (SMDs)] ranged from -0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.12 to -0.01] for MLD to -0.98 (95% CI: -1.50 to -0.45) for cryotherapy. Among these physical therapy modalities, cryotherapy showed the highest probability of being ranked among the more effective interventions (Surface under the cumulative ranking curve = 88.0%), followed by kinesio taping (83.1%) and electroacupuncture (64.0%). Among these interventions, electroacupuncture (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI: -1.19 to 0.00), kinesio taping (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI: -1.54 to -0.18) and cryotherapy (SMD = -0.95, 95% CI: -1.59 to -0.31) demonstrated significant pain reduction compared to continuous passive motion. However, the overall certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low for most comparisons. Conclusion: This NMA suggests that cryotherapy may be the most effective physical therapy modality for early postoperative pain relief after TKA, followed by kinesio taping and electroacupuncture. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the overall low to very low certainty of evidence and potential risk of bias in the included studies. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these results and strengthen the evidence base for clinical decision-making. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024518900 identifier CRD42024518900.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.