ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Different Diode Laser Approaches in the Treatment of Oral Mucocele: Report of Two Cases.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Different Diode Laser Approaches in the Treatment of Oral Mucocele: Report of Two Cases.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe and compare two different diode laser approaches in the management of oral mucoceles of the lower lip. Case Presentation: Two patients presented with recurrent swellings of the lower lip, clinically diagnosed as mucoceles. Both lesions measured approximately 8-9 mm and had been present for several months, with repeated episodes of rupture and recurrence. In Case 1, a 40-year-old woman underwent complete excision using a diode laser. In Case 2, a young adult received a conservative diode laser technique involving removal of the cyst roof and laser ablation of the base. Results: In both cases, surgery was completed without complications. The excisional approach achieved rapid healing, excellent aesthetic outcome, and no recurrence at 1-year follow-up. The conservative technique resulted in a smaller surgical wound, uneventful healing, and similarly no recurrence after 1 year. Conclusion: Diode lasers represent a safe and effective option for the treatment of oral mucoceles, providing excellent intraoperative control, reduced morbidity, and high patient acceptance. These two cases highlight that both complete excision and conservative intralesional diode laser techniques can lead to successful outcomes without recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.