Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327843›Full record

ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026

Sequential Double Autotransplantation Using Immature Teeth as First-Stage Autotransplants to Preserve Alveolar Architecture: A Case Series.

Miks Lejnieks, Juan E Onetto, Marie-Therese Flores, Andris Abeltins, Girts Salms, Sergio E Uribe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miks LejnieksDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Rīga Stradiņš University, Rīga, Latvia, rsu.lv.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9903-9452
Juan E OnettoDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile, uv.cl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-3029
Marie-Therese FloresDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile, uv.cl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2412-190X
Andris AbeltinsInstitute of Stomatology, Rīga Stradiņš University, Rīga, Latvia, rsu.lv.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-315X
Girts SalmsDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Rīga Stradiņš University, Rīga, Latvia, rsu.lv.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7835-734X
Sergio E UribeInstitute of Stomatology, Rīga Stradiņš University, Rīga, Latvia, rsu.lv.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0684-2025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Missing teeth in growing patients require treatment approaches that preserve alveolar bone and support continued development. Autotransplantation offers a biological alternative to implants, yet severely compromised recipient sites and immature donor teeth present clinical challenges. This case series describes a sequential double autotransplantation protocol using immature first-stage autotransplants to preserve alveolar architecture and exploit the osteogenic potential of periodontal ligament-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for alveolar bone regeneration. Methods: Three patients (ages 16-18 years) with severe bone defects, oroantral communication, or cystic pathology underwent planned two-stage autotransplantation. CBCT-guided planning and 3D-printed templates were used to minimize extra-alveolar time. Immature donor teeth were used as first-stage transplants to preserve alveolar architecture and periodontal space prior to definitive transplantation. Secondary transplantation with a more developmentally mature donor followed assessment at 12 months. Results: All cases achieved favorable outcomes at 24 months after second-stage autotransplantation, including pulp chamber obliteration without periapical pathology or clinical symptoms, consistent with maintained pulp vitality, continued root development, and periodontal probing depths of 2-3 mm at final follow-up. Conclusions: The primary lesson is that recipient site condition, rather than donor tooth development alone, determines prognosis in severely compromised cases, and a staged protocol can preserve alveolar architecture for definitive rehabilitation. Recipient site condition, rather than donor tooth developmental stage alone, appears to be the primary determinant of outcome in severely compromised cases. Validation through larger controlled studies remains essential.

Indexed as

autotransplantationcase reportimmature toothpulp vitalityroot development

Identifiers

PMID42327843
PMCPMC13282683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.