ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for post-stroke spasticity: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-stroke spasticity (PSS) is a common motor complication during stroke recovery, imposing a substantial burden on both individuals and society owing to its high morbidity and disability rates. Current evidence suggests that acupuncture may be an effective intervention for alleviating PSS; however, the efficacy and safety remain uncertain owing to methodological limitations and the generally low quality of the existing evidence. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of acupuncture for PSS and to explore the underlying anti-spasticity mechanisms. Methods: This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 180 patients diagnosed with post-stroke spasticity (PSS) will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the three groups: acupuncture, sham acupuncture, or the basic treatment group. Participants in the acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups will receive a 4-week intervention, followed by a 4-week follow-up period. In contrast, the basic treatment group will receive only conventional medical management and standardized rehabilitation training without any acupuncture-related procedures. The primary outcome measure will be spasticity severity, assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). The secondary outcomes will include motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FMA), clinical spasticity (Clinical Spasticity Index, CSI), neurological impairment (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS), activities of daily living (Modified Barthel Index, MBI), neuromuscular activity (surface electromyography, sEMG), and muscle mechanical properties (ultrasonographic elastography, UE). The FMA, CSI, NIHSS, and MBI will be evaluated at baseline, week 2, week 4 (end of treatment), and the 4-week follow-up visit. The MAS, sEMG, and UE will be assessed at baseline and at the end of the 4-week treatment period. Discussion: The results of this trial will help to clarify the preliminary efficacy, clinical feasibility, and safety of acupuncture for PSS patients and explore the anti-spastic mechanisms of acupuncture. Clinical trial registration: https://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/mgt/project/view/1963190034123325440, ITMCTR2025001662.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.