ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Machine learning-based prediction model for cognitive frailty in elderly patients with ischaemic stroke: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive frailty (CF), which is characterised by the coexistence of cognitive impairment and physical frailty, is common among older patients after ischaemic stroke (IS) and is associated with adverse functional outcomes. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting 3-month CF risk in older patients with IS. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 402 older patients with IS were enrolled. Baseline assessments included 26 candidate variables, such as demographic characteristics, stroke severity, nutritional status, psychosocial factors, and vascular markers. Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression within the training set. Ten supervised ML algorithms were evaluated, including random forest (RF), CatBoost, and XGBoost. Model interpretability was assessed using SHAP. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and decision curve analysis. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, 149 patients (37.1%) developed CF. Among the evaluated models, the RF model demonstrated the best overall performance on the held-out internal test set, with an AUC of 0.889, an accuracy of 0.798, and a sensitivity of 0.909. SHAP analysis revealed that the discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, age, and white matter hyperintensity burden were major contributors to model prediction. Depression and social support also demonstrated notable interactive effects. The RF model demonstrated favourable calibration and net clinical benefit across a range of threshold probabilities. Conclusion: This study developed an interpretable ML-based model for estimating early CF risk in older patients after IS using routinely available clinical variables. These findings suggest that neurological, nutritional, and psychosocial factors may jointly contribute to poststroke CF risk. Although the model demonstrated promising performance in terms of internal validation, external validation is needed before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.