Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327806›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in neurology

Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the management of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial with different time intervals between sessions.

Míriam Tur Segura, Antoni Morral, Francisca Gimeno Esteve, Tamara Biedermann Villagra, Ana Mangas Hernández, Sonia Ancosta Diez, Jordi Jiménez Redondo, Nicolás García Rodríguez, Raimon Milà Villarroel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05702606 (Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Management of Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05702606 nacompletednot on this map

Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Management of Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacio Aspace CatalunyaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled73ConditionsCerebral Palsy, Spasticity, Muscle, Extracorporeal Shock Wave TherapyArmsRadial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Míriam Tur SeguraDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fundació Aspace Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni MorralSchool of Health Sciences Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisca Gimeno EsteveDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fundació Aspace Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Tamara Biedermann VillagraDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fundació Aspace Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Mangas HernándezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fundació Aspace Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Sonia Ancosta DiezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fundació Aspace Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi Jiménez RedondoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fundació Aspace Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Nicolás García RodríguezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fundació Aspace Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Raimon Milà VillarroelSchool of Health Sciences Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spasticity is the most frequent motor disorder in cerebral palsy (CP). Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) has emerged as an effective, non-invasive, and well-tolerated alternative for the management of clinical manifestations of spasticity in patients with CP. Despite the variability in administration protocols, no study has evaluated whether extending the time interval between sessions allows prolongation of the therapeutic benefit on these clinical manifestations. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to three groups. The control group received three rESWT sessions with a one-week interval between sessions, experimental group 1 received three rESWT sessions with a two-week interval between sessions, and experimental group 2 received three rESWT sessions with a four-week interval between sessions. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in changes in stretch angles of the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles, assessed using the Modified Tardieu Scale. Secondary outcomes were the functional response in overall mobility assessed with the Timed Up and Go Test and improvement in gait assessed with the 10-Meter Walk Test. Outcomes were assessed in all study groups immediately before the first rESWT session and at 3, 5, 9, 12, and 24 weeks from the start of treatment. Results: Seventy-one patients completed the intervention. In all groups, a significant improvement in passive range of motion and in the catch angle of the triceps surae muscle was observed between baseline and the end of follow-up ( Discussion: Although no significant differences were observed between treatment groups and increasing the time interval between sessions was not associated with a prolongation of the therapeutic effect, all groups showed a statistically significant improvement compared with baseline. Conclusion: These results suggest that, from a clinical perspective, rESWT application may allow a degree of flexibility, enabling adjustment of the intersession interval according to clinical needs and patient availability without compromising the observed therapeutic effects. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05702606.

Indexed as

cerebral palsyradial extracorporeal shock wave therapyrESWTshock wave therapyspasticity

Identifiers

PMID42327806
PMCPMC13279080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.