Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327774›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Beyond prediction: AI as a mechanistic microscope and digital twin for colorectal cancer immunotherapy.

Zijun Zhou, Jianping Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zijun Zhou *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jianping Zhou *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major cause of cancer-related death, yet the benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors are limited to a small subset of patients, particularly those with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient tumors. Most patients with microsatellite-stable disease derive little benefit, and even responsive subgroups show substantial heterogeneity and acquired resistance. These challenges highlight the need for biomarkers and therapeutic frameworks that can not only predict response, but also explain underlying biology and support dynamic treatment decisions. In this review, we propose that artificial intelligence (AI) can move beyond prediction to serve two broader roles in CRC immunotherapy: as a mechanistic microscope that reveals hidden tumor-immune interactions from multimodal data, and as a digital twin that models patient-specific therapeutic trajectories over time. We summarize recent advances in AI-based pathology, imaging, and liquid biopsy for pretreatment stratification and response monitoring, and discuss how these approaches may inform resistance mapping, adaptive trial design, and strategies to convert immunologically "cold" tumors into "hot" tumors. We further examine key translational barriers, including generalizability, interpretability, and regulatory validation. By integrating multimodal data with mechanistic modeling, AI may help shift CRC immunotherapy from population-level prediction toward dynamic, individualized precision oncology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceColorectal NeoplasmsImmunotherapyBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMicrosatellite InstabilityBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsartificial intelligenceCRC (colorectal cancer)digital twinimmunotherapymechanistic microscope

Identifiers

PMID42327774
PMCPMC13279405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.