ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2026
Exploring the spiking neural autoencoder: from hyperexcitability to noise-driven compensation.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding how artificial neural networks (ANNs) can capture biologically meaningful dynamics is a central challenge in systems neuroscience. In this work, we investigate whether spiking neural networks (SNNs) can function not only as machine-learning tools but also as biologically inspired computational analogs and tractable Methods: We implemented a spiking autoencoder composed of Leaky Integrate-and-Fire and Synaptic neuron models to create a controlled framework for analyzing how biologically related parametric changes to neuronal and synaptic dynamics influence learning and information transfer. By tuning model parameters to induce persistent overfiring-like behavior, we emulated a hyperexcitability-like regime conceptually analogous to NaV channel dysfunction in hippocampal circuits. Reconstruction performance and network activity were evaluated under both noiseless and noisy conditions. Results: The induced hyperexcitability-like regime degraded image reconstruction performance and disrupted stable information propagation, consistent with impaired processing in hyperexcitable neural systems. Layer-wise firing-rate analysis revealed that the altered regime was characterized by unstable activity redistribution rather than sustained global overactivation. Importantly, introducing controlled Gaussian noise into the input stream partially restored reconstruction quality and improved learning performance, suggesting that stochastic perturbations can partially compensate for instability in dysfunctional network regimes. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that specific SNN parameter regimes can reproduce key signatures of pathological excitability while also providing a platform for investigating compensatory mechanisms. Overall, this work positions spiking autoencoders as scalable, biologically grounded frameworks for hypothesis-driven studies of neural dysfunction and candidate interventions, supporting the integration of ANN methodologies with mechanistic models in systems neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.