ArticleNeurology. Education2026
Curriculum Innovation:
Article in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Problem Statement: Establishing a foundation of outpatient knowledge is key for child neurology residents as they prepare for careers shaped by evolving diagnostics and treatments. Although national recommendations define core didactic content, strategies for implementation vary widely. To address this gap, educators developed the Objectives: On participation, learners will (1) develop competency in outpatient child neurology foundational principles and (2) cultivate self-directed learning behaviors through an asynchronous curriculum. Methods and Curriculum Description: Results and Assessment Data: Ten residents (100%) participated in the pilot. Overall completion rate was 97%, with individual rates ranging from 75% to 107%. Of 129 completed modules, 116 (89.9%) were passed on the first attempt. Mean assessment score was 4.4/5 (SD = 0.8), and median completion time was 43 minutes (IQR-17-470 minutes). Patient care was the most common motivator (41.9%). Postmodule survey ratings revealed 95.7% (mean = 4.5/5; SD = 0.6) of content as essential to practice and 94% (mean = 4.5/5; SD = 0.6) reporting likelihood to apply material. Ratings increased across training levels-PGY-3 = 4.0 (SD = 1.1), PGY-4 = 4.4 (SD = 0.8), and PGY-5 = 4.7 (SD = 0.6) ( Discussion and Lessons Learned: Early work at a single institution supports the feasibility and quality of an asynchronous, article-based curriculum for outpatient child neurology education. Key lessons from the pilot included prioritizing usability to support sustained engagement and aligning content with clinical responsibilities. Future work will evaluate scalability across multiple institutions and explore qualitative insights to optimize integration of asynchronous curricula.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.