ArticlePNAS nexus2026
Critical zone agrohydrology: An integrative paradigm for agricultural water sustainability.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meeting rising food demand under intensifying climate variability, soil degradation, and groundwater decline requires agriculture to produce more with less freshwater. We advance critical zone agrohydrology (CZA) as a unifying framework that treats agricultural landscapes as human-managed critical zones-coupled systems extending from canopy to bedrock and operating from seasons to decades. CZA is organized around the four deeps (deep time, deep depth, deep coupling, and deep practice) and operationalized through a 5M cycle of measuring, mapping, monitoring, modeling, and managing. This perspective expands conventional agrohydrology by accounting for long-term soil change, subsurface storage and flow, biogeochemical feedbacks, and human decision-making, thereby linking field efficiency with basin sufficiency. We illustrate implications for multifunctional soil management, nutrient-loss control, salinity rehabilitation, drought resilience, managed aquifer recharge, and cross-scale governance. By reframing agriculture as a potential contributor to aquifer stability, water quality, carbon storage, biodiversity, and durable productivity, CZA offers a practical pathway toward more resilient and basin-aware agricultural water management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.