ArticleJAMIA open2026
Integration of intraoperative data in interpretable machine learning models to predict postoperative AKI in noncardiac surgery patients.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to (1) quantify changes in discrimination when adding intraoperative data to preoperative data and (2) compare tabular machine learning with feature engineering against a time-aware LSTM-based model. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort of 46 204 adults undergoing 57 055 eligible noncardiac surgery in the INSPIRE database. We extracted 38 preoperative and 49 intraoperative variables; acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined by KDIGO serum creatinine criteria and modeled as stage 2/3 postoperative AKI. Models were trained on preoperative-only and combined pre- and intraoperative data. Intraoperative series were summarized using eight statistical features for tabular models or integrated directly using an MLP+LSTM architecture. Results: GBT with combined features achieved the highest AUROC (0.896, 95% CI, 0.878-0.914), followed by combined AutoGluon (0.893, 95% CI, 0.877-0.909) and preoperative-only GBT (0.891, 95% CI, 0.871-0.910). ASA-PS ≥3 (AUROC 0.723, 95% CI, 0.700-0.746) and adapted GS-AKI (AUROC 0.719, 95% CI, 0.700-0.739) underperformed machine-learning models. The hybrid MLP+LSTM model did not outperform simpler tabular models (AUROC 0.870, 95% CI, 0.848-0.892). Discussion: The small gain from adding low-frequency intraoperative summaries suggests that most discriminative information for stage 2/3 postoperative AKI was available before surgery. Conclusion: Preoperative tabular ML models provided excellent prediction of postoperative AKI, and added limited incremental discrimination at the available sampling frequency. Future work should evaluate whether higher-frequency intraoperative signals better leverage time-aware architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.