Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327623›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

Data-derived Identity Verification as a principle for the dissemination, harmonization, and artificial intelligence reuse of sensitive biomedical data.

Benjamin A Cordier, Erik S Benton, Eamon J Dysinger, Shannon K McWeeney, AI-READI Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin A CordierKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5122-7879
Erik S BentonOregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.
Eamon J DysingerInformation Technology Group, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.
Shannon K McWeeneyKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.
AI-READI Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To facilitate responsible biomedical data sharing, large-scale data harmonization, and cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) applications by augmenting controlled-access data dissemination models (DDMs) with Data-derived Identity Verification (DIVe). Materials and Methods: We developed a watermarking-based DIVe system that embeds a cryptographically verifiable and traceable identity within each data file. This system was deployed for the Artificial Intelligence Ready and Exploratory Atlas for Diabetes Insights Consortium and currently watermarks a 3.8TB multimodal dataset for each approved data request. Results: Over 1.8 petabytes, spanning over 900 data copies and 160 million files, have been uniquely watermarked and disseminated. Private provenance tracing, a novel data sharing license, and educational materials extend trust and accountability beyond controlled environments. Discussion: Typical controlled-access DDMs assume data remain at rest. Data-derived Identity Verification provides an organizing principle for augmenting DDMs such that data can move while maintaining protection from data leaks. Conclusion: Watermarking-based DIVe supports secure, traceable dissemination of sensitive data, supporting the development of AI technologies in biomedicine.

Indexed as

and social implicationsartificial intelligenceCloud Computingdata protectionethicalinformation disseminationlegal

Identifiers

PMID42327623
PMCPMC13278835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.