ArticleJAMIA open2026
Early experience with a patient-facing AI chatbot integrated in a patient portal.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and significance: Many patients struggle to interpret lab and test results. Objective: To evaluate patient experience, usability, and intention to reuse an AI assistant integrated into a patient portal's test results interface, aimed at enhancing patient comprehension of laboratory and diagnostic findings. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 131 adults using a non-production portal instance. Participants accessed their lab results via the embedded AI assistant and completed a post-use survey. Outcomes included System Usability Scale (SUS), reuse intention (5-point Likert), and Net Promoter Score (NPS). Multivariable regression examined associations of outcomes with patient characteristics. Results: Mean SUS was 81.0 ( Conclusions: A secure, portal-integrated AI assistant showed strong usability and satisfaction, particularly among patients with greater comorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.