ArticleThe Ulster medical journal2026
Investigating Iron Deficiency Anaemia in the Elderly.
Article in The Ulster medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is often attributed to gastrointestinal (GI) blood loss and warrants thorough investigation. In elderly, endoscopy carries increased risk, especially in those with multiple comorbidities and poor functional status. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of elderly patients with IDA, identify underlying causes, and assess one-year mortality. Methodology: Patients ≥75 years referred to gastroenterology for investigation of IDA were recruited. Demographics, comorbidities, antiplatelet/antithrombotic use, investigations performed, and one-year mortality were recorded. Results: 92 patients were recruited. Mean patient age was 81.2 years (SD: +/- 4.02) with a female preponderance (70.7%). Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 5.96 (SD +/- 1.93). Frailty precluded any investigation in 13% of patients. 26% underwent upper and lower GI assessment (14% had bidirectional endoscopy and 12% had oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) + computed tomography (CT) colonography). Malignancy was diagnosed in 6.5%. Overall, one-year mortality rate was 28% (CCI mean score: 6.7). Mortality was statistically significantly higher for patients living in care homes (p=0.03). Higher CCI was associated with increased risk of one-year mortality, and each additional CCI point increased odds of dying within one year by 40% (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.10-1.79, p=0.007). Conclusion: Elderly patients referred for investigation of IDA frequently have a high CCI score, making endoscopy a high-risk procedure. A high CCI score and living in a care home are independent risk factors for one-year mortality. Alternative strategies including trans-nasal endoscopy and CT colonography, should be considered as first-line tests to balance diagnostic yield, prognosis and procedural safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42327595PMC13278059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.