ArticleJournal of Cancer2026
CellVizio
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The best tissue sample is still very important for the diagnosis of mesothorax lymphadenopathy. In the past 20 years endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) has been used efficiently in most cases of primary lung cancer disease or metastatic disease. Several new type of needles have been created such 19G, 18G and hybrid biopsies with cryoprobes. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is used as an additional initial diagnostic tool. Confocal microscopy is a method of rapid on-site evaluation. Patients and Methods: One hundred patients with mesothorax lymphadenopathy were biopsied with ebus and two groups were created one with rapid on-site evaluation with confocal microscopy and one by an operator with microscopic evaluation with sample preparation on cytoglasses. Our main objective was to assess parameters such as time, false negative results between the two techniques and technical issues such as the accessibility and evaluation between the two techniques. Safety was also evaluated. Results: Rapid on-site evaluation is more cost efficient with a cytologist on site, however; with a higher rate of false negative results. Accessibility with the Cellvizio Discussion: Confocal is a safe and time-efficient technique for mesothorax lymphadenopathy. A high level of training is required for pulmonary physicians in order to assess the novel imaging technique. Definitely different parts of the lymphnode have to reached and evaluated in order to have a proper initial evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.