Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327535›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

The impact of introducing Unit Practice Councils on nurse engagement, the nurse practice environment and evidence-based practice: A longitudinal observational study.

Marth Mlf Jans, Hillegonda A Stallinga, Mick Aj Olvers, Jolanda Ter Sluysen, Brigitte Jm de Brouwer, Evelyn J Finnema, Rien de Vos, Marjolein Imm Heemels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marth Mlf JansMaastricht University Medical Center, Department of Nursing, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Hillegonda A StallingaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, section of Nursing Science, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Mick Aj OlversMaastricht University Medical Center, Department of Nursing, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jolanda Ter SluysenUniversity Medical Center Nijmegen, Patient Care Institute, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Brigitte Jm de BrouwerAccuralis, Healthcare Research & Consulting, Best, the Netherlands.
Evelyn J FinnemaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, section of Nursing Science, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Rien de VosAmsterdam University Medical Center, Center for Evidence-Based Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marjolein Imm HeemelsMaastricht University Medical Center, Department of Nursing, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare systems face increasing complexity alongside persistent nursing shortages. Shared Governance, operationalized through Unit Practice Councils, is a professional practice model designed to strengthen nurse engagement, accountability and evidence‑informed decision-making at the point of care. While Shared Governance has been associated with positive nurse outcomes, evidence on the impact of Unit Practice Councils in European academic settings remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the impact of introducing Unit Practice Councils on nurse engagement, the nurse practice environment and evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation, and to assess the extent to which Unit Practice Councils are embedded into routine practice inpatient units. Design: Longitudinal observational study. Methods: Study was conducted across four inpatient units in a Dutch academic hospital. Data were collected at baseline (T0) and at 12-month follow-up (T1) using the Autonomy to Engagement Scan (A tot Z scan), the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) and Evidence Based Practice Implementation Scale (EBP-I). Generalized Estimating Equations were used to analyze changes over time, accounting for interactions between time, council membership, and measurement (paired vs. unpaired). At T1, the Normalization Measure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire was administered to assess the normalization of Unit Practice Councils into routine nursing practice. Differences between council members and non-members were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Study registration: Not registered. Results: A total of 59 nursing staff participated at T0 and 63 at T1, with 36 completing both measurements. Nurse engagement and the nurse practice environment showed small but significant improvements over time ( Conclusion: Introducing Unit Practice Councils, particularly alongside structured EBP training, resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in EBP among council members with continuing membership. Council members also showed early positive trends in nurse engagement and the nurse practice environment, while outcomes in the broader nursing workforce remained stable over the 12‑month period. High normalization scores indicate successful embedding of Unit Practice Councils within routine practice in an academic hospital.

Indexed as

Diffusion of innovationEvidence-based practiceHealth facility environmentLongitudinal studiesNurse engagementShared governance, NursingUnit Practice Councils

Identifiers

PMID42327535
PMCPMC13276460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.