Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327436›Full record

ArticleCJC open2026

Early Insights on Mavacamten Usage in Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Mavacamten Patient Support Program.

Kevin Ong, Patrick Garceau, Andrew M Crean, Andrew D Moeller, Lou Kolman, Stephanie Corriveau, Florence Brellier, Christina Wong, Michael R Ward

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06549608 (Patient Characteristics and Treatment Duration of Mavacamten Obstructive HCM Patient Support Program in Canada), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06549608 completednot on this map

Patient Characteristics and Treatment Duration of Mavacamten Obstructive HCM Patient Support Program in Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2024 to 2025Enrolled683ConditionsHypertrophic CardiomyopathyArmsMavacamten
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kevin OngSt-Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Patrick GarceauMontreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Andrew M CreanUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew D MoellerDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Lou KolmanLibin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Stephanie CorriveauBristol Myers Squibb, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Florence BrellierBristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Christina WongBristol Myers Squibb, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Michael R WardLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Only a limited amount of real-world data are available on the demographic and clinical characteristics of adult patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) treated with mavacamten in Canada. Methods: This observational retrospective cohort study included adult patients with symptomatic oHCM enrolled in the mavacamten patient support program in Canada between January 4, 2023 and April 12, 2024. Baseline demographic information, clinical characteristics, medical history, and mavacamten treatment information were collected from the program database. Results: A total of 683 patients met the eligibility criteria for the study. The median age was 65.0 years (interquartile range: 57.0-73.0); 52.1% of the patients were male; and 67.1% were classified as being in New York Heart Association class II at baseline. Most patients were on beta-blocker monotherapy at baseline (63.7%) and the data cutoff point (76.3%). Almost all patients (99.4%) were initiated with 5 mg of mavacamten. The median follow-up time was 27.4 weeks (range: 1.6-70.1), and the median treatment duration was 24.6 weeks (range: 0.4-64.4). At the data cutoff point, 17.1% of patients were on 2.5 mg of mavacamten, 52.6% were on 5 mg, 20.2% were on 10 mg, and 2.2% were on 15 mg. Mavacamten was discontinued by 7.9% of patients, the main reasons being a side effect or adverse event (2.5%; 17 of 683), an undisclosed physician decision (1.8%; 12 of 683), or lack of efficacy (0.9%; 6 of 683). Conclusions: These early results provide the largest dataset on mavacamten utilization in the Canadian oHCM population. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and mavacamten dose distributions are comparable to those found in clinical trials and real-world studies. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06549608.

Indexed as

hypertrophic cardiomyopathymavacamtenobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathypatient support programreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID42327436
PMCPMC13282525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.