Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327416›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026

Ensuring Rich Rigor of Qualitative Methodologies in Behavior Analytic Research.

Daria K Lorio-Barsten, Selena J Layden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daria K Lorio-BarstenWilliam & Mary, 301 Monticello Ave., Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3428-6601
Selena J LaydenOld Dominion University, Norfolk, VA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9111-4991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative methods remain the hallmark of research in applied behavior analysis. Yet, such methods frequently fail to capture the nuances of context where behavior analysis is practiced. Therefore, qualitative methods can provide complementary means to gain deeper insight into changes in socially significant behavior. We believe that researchers within the field of behavior analysis have much to gain from embracing qualitative methodologies. We propose that more researchers can and should consider conducting rigorous qualitative research to elevate the voices of the participants and relate the depth and complexities of their nuanced experiences. This article discusses Tracy's "big tent" quality criteria to offer guidance to qualitative researchers on ensuring their studies possess high quality. Two recent qualitative research studies, conducted by the authors, are offered as illustrations to demonstrate how "big tent" criteria can be applied to design and conduct meaningful and rigorous research of high quality. We hope that these examples can encourage other researchers in the field of behavior analysis to feel more confident and see value in conducting qualitative research to gain a more comprehensive understanding of human behavior.

Indexed as

MethodologyQualitativeResearch Rigor

Identifiers

PMID42327416
PMCPMC13275958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.