Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327415›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026

Exploring Teachers' Familiarity and Perceptions of Preference Assessments.

David Ray Gutierrez Miranda, Hedda Meadan, Jasmine Begeske, Samira Bashiru, John Augustine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David Ray Gutierrez MirandaUniversity of West Georgia, 1601 Maple Street, Carrollton, GA 30117 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0423-4790
Hedda MeadanUniversity of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7098-6176
Jasmine BegeskePurdue University, 100 N. University Street, Office 5120, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1046-5955
Samira BashiruPurdue University, 100 N. University Street, Office 5120, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.ORCID 0009-0003-4125-2909
John AugustineUniversity of Missouri, Columbus, MO USA.ORCID 0009-0007-9409-2426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using reinforcers and student preferences may contribute to appropriate academic and behavioral outcomes for students with disabilities. Special education teachers may identify potential reinforcers and student preferences by using preference assessment procedures, which are observation-based procedures to identify and rank student preferences. However, there is limited research on special education teachers' knowledge of preference assessments and how frequently they use preference assessments in the classroom. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore special education preschool teachers' understanding, usage, and perception of preference assessment procedures. Seven special education preschool teachers in Indiana participated in study interviews. Findings revealed that teachers had little to no understanding or a very broad understanding of preference assessments, and they rarely implemented preference assessments in their classroom. Teachers believed that preference assessments are a socially valid procedure for identifying reinforcers, but most teachers did not see a need to implement them often. Potential barriers for teachers' implementation of preference assessments are discussed.

Indexed as

PerceptionsPreference assessmentsPreschoolQualitativeSpecial education

Identifiers

PMID42327415
PMCPMC13276086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.