ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026
"Tensions That I'm Having to Navigate": Reflections on Qualitative Approaches From Behavior Analyst Researchers.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Researching qualitatively can act as a catalyst to critically evaluate assumptions of objectivity and reflexivity. This article provides reflections of researchers, trained (and practicing) in behavior analysis, who are navigating diverse qualitative research in quantitative spaces. Influenced by critical collaborative autoethnography, this article provides our individual reflections processed collectively during group conversations. Through these discussions we reflect on the tensions we have experienced as behavior analysts engaging in qualitative research. We explore and unpack what qualitative approaches have prompted us to question: what is science, where is truth located, who has knowledge, and how is it accessed? This article may look different to the research behavior analysts typically read; we hope this stimulates an imagination for all that qualitative research can offer, while simultaneously avoiding an uncritical idealization of these approaches. We aim to model discomfort within the article, as a powerful tool to think reflexively about how these tensions align with our own values as researchers, and those of the field at large.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.