Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327404›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026

Considerations for Applied Behavior Analysts Embracing Intersectional Qualitative Research Within the Context of Intervention Research.

Sophia R D'Agostino, Sarah E Pinkelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophia R D'AgostinoDepartment of Special Education and Rehabilitation Counseling, Utah State University, 2865 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5268-3673
Sarah E PinkelmanDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a pivotal time for researchers in applied behavior analysis (ABA) to embrace intersectional qualitative methods as ABA has faced criticism for its use of aversive procedures, emphasis on compliance, and focus on normalization, which can be detrimental to autistic individuals and other marginalized groups. It is imperative ABA shifts and adjusts to remain relevant and meaningful to the people we aim to support while encouraging social justice for all. Intersectional qualitative inquiry allows us to uncover how systems of privilege and oppression affect those who experience them: that is, how an individual's interactions with these systems produce their learning history. Better understanding an individual's learning history by examining intersectionality through qualitative inquiry allows us to integrate social justice and equity more deeply into ABA work. Applied behavior analysts must critically evaluate their practices and adopt approaches that respect and acknowledge the lived experiences of individuals, especially those from marginalized communities. This conceptual manuscript outlines considerations for embracing intersectional qualitative inquiry, including ways to begin thinking intersectionally that align with behavior analysis and of how intersectionality applies to each stage of the research process.

Indexed as

Behavior analysisIntersectionalityQualitative inquiry

Identifiers

PMID42327404
PMCPMC13275936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.