Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327398›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026

Utility of Qualitative Methods to Expand Behavior-Analytic Perspectives: A Reflection.

Stephanie H Jones, Denys Brand, Sofia Abuin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie H JonesDepartment of Psychology, Salve Regina University, 100 Ochre Point Avenue, Newport, RI 02840 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3946-0261
Denys BrandPsychology Department, California State University, Sacramento, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8596-1975
Sofia AbuinDepartment of Psychology, Salve Regina University, 100 Ochre Point Avenue, Newport, RI 02840 USA.ORCID 0009-0006-6368-734X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-case designs are commonly used to produce demonstrations of control on an individual-level in behavior-analytic research. The selection of alternative methods of investigation, such as qualitative approaches, may expand areas of analysis and discussion for behavior analysts. Integrating alternative research methods often necessitates collaboration with experts within fields that commonly use those designs. As a result, strategies to effectively collaborate and integrate research methods not presently in one's scope of competence may warrant additional consideration and inquiry. The present paper discusses and highlights insights and skills gained from experiences collaborating with qualitative researchers and reflecting on relevant lessons that were learned.

Indexed as

FidelityQualitativeResearch collaborationSingle case

Identifiers

PMID42327398
PMCPMC13275948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.