Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327389›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2026

A Call to Action for Qualitative Behavior Analysis.

Victoria Burney, Ebonee Hodder, Clare M McCann, Sehar Moughal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victoria BurneySchool of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6087-221X
Ebonee HodderSchool of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0002-3194-8550
Clare M McCannSchool of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1221-608X
Sehar MoughalSchool of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2606-063X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The convergence of many shifts within and outside the field of behavior analysis have led to an important conclusion: now more than ever before, qualitative behavior analysis as a distinct branch of behaviorism is warranted, useful, and necessary. This article explores what qualitative behavior analysis could be, and do, within the field of behavior analysis. An outline of how qualitative behavior analysis can fit within the broader field is provided. Ways in which qualitative behavior analysis can be considered consistent with radical behaviorism are discussed, alongside a consideration of tenets which discriminate qualitative behavior analysis as a unique branch of the broader behavior analytic field. In advancing a call for qualitative behavior analysis, we invite the field to consider and discuss how, and why, a qualitative branch to our science might bring value, and ameliorate some of the big issues facing behavior analysis today.

Identifiers

PMID42327389
PMCPMC13275979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.