Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327251›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Reassessing Choice Probability: What 59 Macaque Studies Tell Us About Decision-Related Activity in Visual Cortex.

Anton Pletenev, Richard T Born, Gregory C DeAngelis, Raymond Doudlah, Ichiro Fujita, Joshua I Gold, Robbe L T Goris, Alexander C Huk, Kristine Krug, Pooya Laamerad and 12 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Anton PletenevDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-650X
Richard T BornProgram in Neuroscience, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gregory C DeAngelisDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1635-1273
Raymond DoudlahDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Ichiro FujitaGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Joshua I GoldDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robbe L T GorisCenter for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Alexander C HukFuster Laboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Departments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences & Ophthalmology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kristine KrugInstitute of Biology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Pooya LaameradDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Richard D LangeCenter for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Aaron J LeviCenter for Perceptual Systems, Departments of Neuroscience & Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Hendrikje NienborgLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christopher C PackDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Andrew J ParkerInstitute of Biology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ari RosenbergDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Mehdi SanayeiSchool of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran.
Takanori UkaDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Xuefei YuCenter for Neuroscience, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Adam ZaidelGonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Corey M ZiembaLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ralf M HaefnerDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

Hierarchical cortical circuits implementing robust 3D visual perceptionR01EY029438 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Ari Rosenberg · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
Cortical processing of three-dimensional object-motionR01EY035005 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Ari Rosenberg · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
CRCNS: The neural basis of probabilistic inference in the visual systemR01EY028811 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAEFNER, RALF MANFRED · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
Uncertainty, inference, and introspection in the primate visual systemR01EY032999 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI GORIS, ROBBE L · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028811NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029438NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032999NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choice probability (CP) quantifies the trial-by-trial covariation between a sensory neuron's response and perceptual reports. Despite extensive interest in CP as a window into how perception is linked to the activity of sensory neurons, the usefulness of CP remains debated. On one hand, reported CP magnitudes vary widely across seemingly equivalent studies, questioning its utility as a metric. On the other hand, the absence of clear patterns in CP variability has made it difficult to use it to adjudicate between competing models of visual perception. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of 150 CP estimates from 59 macaque neurophysiology studies to identify factors that systematically influence CP. We confirmed the positive relationship between CP and neuronal sensitivity both across and within individual studies. When controlled for sensitivity, we found remarkable consistency in CP across varying tasks and brain regions with two notable exceptions. First, CPs were higher in tasks involving bistable percepts, reinforcing the link between CP magnitude and subjective perception. Second, CPs were smaller in area V1, supporting prior suggestions about V1's special role in visual processing. We further found a significant effect of stimulus duration on CP, providing evidence against strictly feedforward models and favoring models with substantial feedback and recurrent processing. Finally, we offer recommendations for future studies to enhance the cross-study comparability and theoretical utility of choice signals as the field transitions to large-scale population recordings. More broadly, our findings demonstrate the benefits of meta-studies that expose patterns across many different tasks and animals - yielding insights that complement large-scale population recordings.

Identifiers

PMID42327251
PMCPMC13278128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.