ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Improving splice site usage prediction with SPLAIRE.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Alternative splicing, the mechanism by which intronic sequences are excised from pre-mRNAs to produce mature mRNA, affects >95% of human protein-coding genes and is a major driver of human disease states. The spliceosome, a protein-RNA complex responsible for splicing pre-mRNA, identifies candidate splice sites partly through the recognition of characteristic sequence motifs at exon-intron junctions. Deep learning models that predict the presence of splice sites from pre-mRNA sequence have achieved breakthrough performance relative to previous machine-learning techniques, and these models have improved our ability to identify pathogenic genetic variants that alter splicing. Results: We show that, while overall performance measures from these models suggest near-perfect performance, substantial gaps in prediction remain, including the identification of splice sites with low usage rates and tissue-specific splice sites. We leverage one of the largest paired RNA and genotyping datasets used to date to train a novel splicing model optimized for a specific cell type, human airway epithelial cells. We trained a dilated convolutional neural network on data from cultured airway epithelial cells from 100 donors, and showed that this model outperforms current state-of-the-art models on splice site identification and splice site usage quantification, including on multiple tissues not included in the model training data. Conclusions: We present the most comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art splicing models published to date, revealing reasonable performance across models for genetic variant effect prediction along with important performance gaps and insights into directions for future model development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.