ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Why do we seek information about the future? On the origins of subjective value without instrumental value.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Why do we want to know the future? Humans and many animals pay for information to predict uncertain rewards, even when they cannot control them. The reason for this conserved yet seemingly paradoxical preference - "subjective value without instrumental value" - remains unknown. Here we develop a normative framework to explain the origins of such preferences, their persistence across species, and their contributions to survival. We formalize and evaluate theories that explain subjective value as originating from an adaptive estimate of advantage for solving core computational problems in naturalistic environments. We show that human and animal subjective values are remarkably well suited to solve these problems, accomplishing the goals of multiple theories simultaneously. We derive novel forms of information to enable existing theories to be dissociated, and show that pooling their subjective values improves performance across diverse environments. Thus, organisms may value information because it pays diverse dividends in nature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.