ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Positive Interpretation of Emotional Ambiguity Across Development: LC-dlPFC Circuitry.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotionally ambiguous facial expressions provide a tractable model for studying how uncertain affective information is resolved into categorical judgments. Here we tested whether developmental differences in this process are reflected in locus coeruleus (LC) circuitry and how these neural effects relate to behavioral and decision-process indices of interpretive bias. Participants from late childhood through middle-aged adulthood completed an angry-to-happy facial morph task during fMRI. Behavioral responses were analyzed using signal detection theory, and drift-diffusion modeling, and fMRI data were analyzed using LC-seeded generalized psychophysiological interaction and trial-level neural models. Positive bias increased systematically across development. Drift-diffusion analyses showed that this shift was captured specifically by drift intercept, a stimulus-independent evaluative component of evidence accumulation, rather than by perceptual sensitivity, starting point, or response caution. At the neural level, the association between LC-dlPFC coupling and positive bias was strongest in middle-aged adults. Trial-level analyses further indicated that dlPFC carried the clearer moment-to-moment evaluative signal, whereas LC contributed through slower temporal properties, indexed by the Hurst exponent, that shaped bias-related cortical coupling. Importantly, higher LC structural integrity (contrast-to-noise ratio) was associated with lower LC temporal persistence and, in turn, more negative LC-dlPFC coupling. Together, these findings suggest that age-related differences in positive interpretation are not simply differences in perceptual sensitivity or response tendency, but reflect age-graded variation in evaluative evidence accumulation supported by LC-dlPFC circuitry. This work extends recent evidence implicating LC-prefrontal connectivity in ambiguity processing and identifies evaluative drift bias as an age-graded circuit-level signature of emotional ambiguity resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.