ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Effects of Left Atrial Wall Thickness on Myocardial Mechanics and Blood Dynamics using Multiscale Modeling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Patient-specific models of left atrial (LA) mechanics often assume uniform left atrial wall thickness (LAWT), but the effect of LAWT on the mechanics and hemodynamics remains less quantified. Methods: Four LA myocardium models were built from gated CTA images: a baseline variable thickness (VT#0), two reduced-dilation variants, and a 2 mm uniform thickness model. Multiscale mechanics and blood flow simulations were performed across all the thickness variants using model parameters personalized on the baseline model. Predicted displacements, wall stresses and strains, and hemodynamics were compared. Results: Across all LAWT variants, myocardial volume spanned 14.4-19.9 mL (38%), while cavity volume remained mostly within 5% of image data throughout the cardiac cycle. Circulatory system output, myocardial displacements, and strains varied by 5-6% relative to the baseline model. Instantaneous stresses increased by up to 19% in the thinner variable thickness models and decreased by up to 16% in the uniformly thick case. Globally, the area under low time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) varied between 23% and 30% across all thickness variants, while LA exposed to elevated oscillatory shear index (OSI) increased from nearly 6% to 19%. Over 90% of LAA was exposed to low shear, but the high-OSI area increased from 7% in VT#0 to over 30% in Uniform. Conclusion: A personalized multiscale modeling framework was leveraged to demonstrate that the left atrial myocardial stresses and oscillatory shear had a greater sensitivity to local wall thickness representation compared to cavity volumes, tissue displacements, strains, and mean blood shear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.