Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42327090›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Machine Learning-Guided Discovery of Bacterial-Selective Membrane-Active Compounds Reveals Mechanistic Bias in Antibiotic Training Datasets.

Connor Chain, Soodabeh Ghaffari, Syrine Belakaria, Joseph P Sheehan, Ido Irani, Chi-Yun Wu, Hahn Kim, Barbara E Engelhardt, Zemer Gitai

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Connor ChainDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0606-3710
Soodabeh GhaffariDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9782-7930
Syrine BelakariaDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0761-0886
Joseph P SheehanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9431-7110
Ido IraniLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7996-8780
Chi-Yun WuGladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4956-4133
Hahn KimDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA.
Barbara E EngelhardtDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6139-7334
Zemer GitaiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3280-6178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of antibiotic resistance necessitates the discovery of antibacterial compounds with novel mechanisms of action (MoAs). Recent machine learning approaches have shown promise in antibacterial compound discovery, but often identify derivatives of known antibiotic classes rather than mechanistically novel compounds. Previous approaches applied Tanimoto similarity filters at the end of screening pipelines, but this method has substantial drawbacks: Tanimoto similarity can be misleading in chemical space, and post-hoc filtering does not influence what activity models learn to prioritize. Here, we present a machine learning pipeline that addresses chemical novelty upfront by employing an XGBoost-based MoA classifier to explicitly prioritize compounds predicted to have mechanisms distinct from known antibiotic classes, combined with graph neural networks for antibacterial activity and toxicity prediction. Applied to the Zinc20 database, our approach successfully identified non-toxic antibacterial compounds structurally distinct from known antibiotics. Notably, the majority of these hits exhibited membrane-targeting activity with selectivity for bacterial cells over mammalian cells, suggesting potential for next-generation membrane-active antibiotics. However, we did not identify compounds with novel protein targets. Systematic analysis revealed that this limitation stems from mechanistic bias in training data rather than model architecture. Specifically, our activity model learned to preferentially score compounds similar to specific groups in the training data, thus overrepresenting certain MoA classes including membrane-active compounds. Even substantial model architecture and training data enhancements did not overcome this constraint. Our findings demonstrate that the primary bottleneck for discovering mechanistically novel antibiotics is the scarcity of diverse, mechanistically-annotated training data. This work provides both a methodological framework for mechanism-aware screening and critical insights into data requirements for genuinely novel antibiotic discovery.

Identifiers

PMID42327090
PMCPMC13278111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.