ArticlePain reports2026
Pain, function, and acute neuropathic pain up to one month after surgery: a registry-based analysis.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Knowledge of how patients experience pain and patterns of resolution beyond the first days after surgery is limited. Acute neuropathic pain (ANeuP) following surgery is rarely assessed. Objectives: We aimed to characterize pain intensity, pain-related functional impairment, ANeuP, and to describe patterns of resolution in a large cohort undergoing diverse surgical procedures up to 1 month postoperatively, the subacute period. Methods: This was an observational, multicentre study. Outcomes were assessed on postoperative days (PODs) 1/7/30 using the PAIN OUT registry methodology. The primary endpoint was the change in pain-related interference between POD7 and POD30. Patient subgroups were identified using cluster analysis. Results: A cohort of 1,153 patients (median age 49; 67% female) was enrolled. By POD30, pain-related functional interference decreased ( Conclusion: Although the majority of patients in the cohort largely recovered in terms of pain and interference by POD30, 16% belonged to the Minimal-pain resolution cluster. These patients may benefit from proactive identification and management by anaesthetists, surgeons, and practitioners in the community before surgery or in the early weeks after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.